Governor Gavin Newsom has recently been criticized for calling California a nation-state in his briefings and appearances. Is California a nation-state? Recently, I was asked by the New York Times to comment on Newsom's use of the term, and I wrote the following memorandum to the Times which resulted in an article on the subject.
It is useful to introduce the word country first and to then consider the words state and nation:
Writing in 1887 (in The American Commonwealth, 2nd Edition, Revised), Viscount James Bryce wrote that California is:
a state on which I dwell the more willingly because it is in many respects the most striking in the whole Union, and has more than any other the character of a great country, capable of standing alone in the world. It has immense wealth in its fertile soil as well as in its minerals and forests. Nature is nowhere more imposing nor her beauties more varied.
California, more than any other part of the Union, is a country by itself, and San Francisco a capital. Cut off from the more populous parts of the Mississippi valley by an almost continuous desert of twelve hundred miles, across which the two daily trains move like ships across the ocean, separated from Oregon on the north by a wilderness of sparsely settled mountain and forest it has grown up in its own way and acquired a sort of consciousness of separate existence. San Francisco dwarfs the other cities, and is a commercial and intellectual centre, and source of influence for the surrounding regions, more powerful over them than is any Eastern city over its neighbourhood. It is a New York which has got no Boston on one side of it, and no shrewd and orderly rural population on the other, to keep it in order. Hence both State and city are less steadied by national opinion than any other State or city within the wide compass of the Union.
California was and is a phenomenon. Today, it is the largest US state with 40 million people, with a majority minority population, and with distinctive geography, needs, and, to some extent, culture. The geography is part of what impressed Bryce. California is bordered on the east by the high Sierra mountains, on the southeast by deserts, in the north by high mountains and forest, and, of course, on the west by ocean. Moreover, California has just about everything: the rich central valley that produces fruit and vegetables for much of the rest of the United States, oil and gas, lumber, mines, and great cities (three of the top ten Los Angeles, San Jose, and San Diego). It has distinctive concerns about the environment and resources. It has been a leader in the control of air pollution and the reduction of CO2 emissions. It has Silicon Valley and the greatest set of universities in the nation. And Los Angeles is a distinctive place in the American imagination with its beaches, mountains, and freeways and with Hollywood which contends with New York for cultural leadership.
Even though the Census Bureau in 2015 tells us that almost 44% of California households speak a language other than English and about 19% report speaking English less than very well, California cannot be said to have a distinctive language as do the Quebecois in Canada (French) and as did the populations in the 15 Union Republics of the Soviet Union. It does not have a distinctive religion as did many of the Union Republics in the Soviet Union (ranging from Orthodox Christian [Russia, Ukraine, Belarus] to Islam [all the Central Asian Republics] to Catholic [Lithuania] or Protestant [Estonia]). Indeed, of the American states, perhaps only Utah can claim a distinctive religious identity in Mormonism.
California can claim ethnic diversity with 37% Hispanic Non-White, 15% Asian, 14% some other race, 6% African American, and 1.2% Native Americans and Alaskan Native. But there is no one common ethnicity instead California is characterized by its diversity. Yet this may be considered a common cultural feature. A 2018 survey found that Californians generally support diversity of beliefs and the idea that respecting cultural difference is important. (See https://belonging.berkeley.edu/californiasurvey-othering-and-belonging).
Bottom Line: Is California a nation? Perhaps in terms of its size, territorial boundaries, its roots in Spanish and Mexican culture with additional layers of Asian and Pacific Islander cultures, its ethnic diversity, and its long-standing concerns for the environment. Certainly, Californians have a sense of themselves as living in a special place.
So is California a Nation-State?
There is nothing wrong with using this term in a colloquial fashion, especially if you are also willing to say that Texas is a nation-state and perhaps even New York or Pennsylvania. Certainly, of all the American states it is best-equipped to be a country by itself with its large territory delimited by ocean, mountains, and desert, and it has a disproportionate impact on the rest of the world as the fifth largest economysmaller than the US as a whole, China, Japan, and Germany but larger than India, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Brazil, Canada, and Russia. California exists vividly in the American imagination and in the minds of Californians.
Certainly, no other state has a better claim on the term.